Political Group Memberships
Voting Statistics
Group Alignment
How often this MEP votes with their political group majority.
Rebel Subjects
Topics where this MEP most often breaks with their political group.
Procedures
191 votesDecision on setting up a special committee on the European Democracy Shield, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of office
Establish a special committee to assess and counter foreign interference and disinformation targeting Union democratic processes.
Decision on setting up a standing committee on Security and Defence and a standing committee on Public Health
Create two permanent parliamentary committees for security/defence and public health issues.
Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2023
Demand improved Commission handling of public access requests for documents, including texts and messages, and extend access scope to all EU bodies.
Council's recommendation on smoke- and aerosol-free environments
Resolution on reinforcing EU’s unwavering support to Ukraine against Russia’s war of aggression and the increasing military cooperation between North Korea and Russia
Demand that EU member states provide Ukraine with military aid equivalent to 0.25% of their GDP annually.
Written Explanations
Written explanations of vote submitted after plenary sessions.
Resolution on the European citizens’ initiative entitled ‘My Voice, My Choice: For Safe and Accessible Abortion’
The adoption of this resolution is a historic moment worth celebrating and a big step forward for the protection of abortion as a fundamental right in the EU. However, I object to the statement regretfully adopted within the context of this resolution, stipulating that 'only biological women can get pregnant and bear children'. First, one thing should be obvious to every lawmaker: there is a difference between sex and gender. While most people who get pregnant are women, some people identifying as men, non-binary or any other gender also have the necessary anatomy to carry a pregnancy. This is a medical fact, not an ideological statement. Denying the lived realities of trans people does not make you 'pro-science'; it just makes you confidently wrong. Second, I regret that colleagues to the right decided to turn this important resolution – which responds to the direct demands of European citizens of all genders – into an arena for voicing transphobic sentiments and anti-trans ideology. It is not worthy of this House, nor of the significance of this initiative. Decisions taken in the European Parliament should be based on facts, evidence and science, not fear-based myths and prejudice. Lawmakers should know the difference.
No written explanations available.