Procédures
23 votesC10-0178/2026 – Proposal for rejection
B10-0336/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
A10-0134/2026 – Saskia Bricmont – Draft Council decision
Résolution sur l'état de droit, les droits fondamentaux et l'utilisation abusive de fonds de l’Union en Slovaquie: nécessité d'une réponse de l'Union
Conditionner l'accès aux fonds européens de la Slovaquie au respect de l'État de droit et à la lutte contre la corruption.
Recommandation à l'intention du Conseil, de la Commission et de la vice-présidente de la Commission / haute représentante de l'Union pour les affaires étrangères et la politique de sécurité concernant la 81e session de l'Assemblée générale des Nations unies
Financer les institutions multilatérales et réformer le Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU pour limiter le droit de veto et y intégrer l'Union européenne.
Explications de vote
Explications de vote soumises après les sessions plénières.
Résolution sur l’initiative citoyenne européenne «My Voice, My Choice: pour un avortement sans danger et accessible»
The adoption of this resolution is a historic moment worth celebrating and a big step forward for the protection of abortion as a fundamental right in the EU. However, I object to the statement regretfully adopted within the context of this resolution, stipulating that 'only biological women can get pregnant and bear children'. First, one thing should be obvious to every lawmaker: there is a difference between sex and gender. While most people who get pregnant are women, some people identifying as men, non-binary or any other gender also have the necessary anatomy to carry a pregnancy. This is a medical fact, not an ideological statement. Denying the lived realities of trans people does not make you 'pro-science'; it just makes you confidently wrong. Second, I regret that colleagues to the right decided to turn this important resolution – which responds to the direct demands of European citizens of all genders – into an arena for voicing transphobic sentiments and anti-trans ideology. It is not worthy of this House, nor of the significance of this initiative. Decisions taken in the European Parliament should be based on facts, evidence and science, not fear-based myths and prejudice. Lawmakers should know the difference.
Aucune explication de vote disponible.