Political Group Memberships
Voting Statistics
Group Alignment
How often this MEP votes with their political group majority.
Rebel Subjects
Topics where this MEP most often breaks with their political group.
Procedures
160 votesNinth report on economic and social cohesion
Fund regional and local development, prioritising decentralised management and maintaining current real-term budget levels post-2027.
Resolution on violations of religious freedom in Tibet
Impose sanctions on Chinese officials responsible for religious freedom violations in Tibet.
Resolution on the return of Ukrainian children forcibly transferred and deported by Russia
Demand Russia provide information on and ensure the return of deported Ukrainian children.
2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Kosovo
Urge Kosovo and Serbia to achieve a legally binding normalisation agreement based on mutual recognition.
2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Serbia
Condition Serbia's EU accession on aligning with EU foreign policy and implementing rule of law reforms.
Written Explanations
Written explanations of vote submitted after plenary sessions.
Resolution on the European citizens’ initiative entitled ‘My Voice, My Choice: For Safe and Accessible Abortion’
The adoption of this resolution is a historic moment worth celebrating and a big step forward for the protection of abortion as a fundamental right in the EU. However, I object to the statement regretfully adopted within the context of this resolution, stipulating that 'only biological women can get pregnant and bear children'. First, one thing should be obvious to every lawmaker: there is a difference between sex and gender. While most people who get pregnant are women, some people identifying as men, non-binary or any other gender also have the necessary anatomy to carry a pregnancy. This is a medical fact, not an ideological statement. Denying the lived realities of trans people does not make you 'pro-science'; it just makes you confidently wrong. Second, I regret that colleagues to the right decided to turn this important resolution – which responds to the direct demands of European citizens of all genders – into an arena for voicing transphobic sentiments and anti-trans ideology. It is not worthy of this House, nor of the significance of this initiative. Decisions taken in the European Parliament should be based on facts, evidence and science, not fear-based myths and prejudice. Lawmakers should know the difference.
No written explanations available.