Skip to content
Terry REINTKE

Terry REINTKE

GREENS (Greens/European Free Alliance)
Bündnis 90/Die Grünen
Born 09 May 1987 in Gelsenkirchen

Political Group Memberships

Current GREENS Greens/European Free Alliance
Jul 2024 – Feb 2026 (342 votes)

Group Alignment

How often this MEP votes with their political group majority.

99.7%
Loyalty Rate
324
loyal votes
1
rebellious vote
Aligned Independent

Rebel Subjects

Topics where this MEP most often breaks with their political group.

Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) 1 rebellious vote

Procedures

18 votes
Clear filters

Written Explanations

Written explanations of vote submitted after plenary sessions.

All explanations →
1 explanations
17 Dec 2025 For
View procedure →

Resolution on the European citizens’ initiative entitled ‘My Voice, My Choice: For Safe and Accessible Abortion’

The adoption of this resolution is a historic moment worth celebrating and a big step forward for the protection of abortion as a fundamental right in the EU. However, I object to the statement regretfully adopted within the context of this resolution, stipulating that 'only biological women can get pregnant and bear children'. First, one thing should be obvious to every lawmaker: there is a difference between sex and gender. While most people who get pregnant are women, some people identifying as men, non-binary or any other gender also have the necessary anatomy to carry a pregnancy. This is a medical fact, not an ideological statement. Denying the lived realities of trans people does not make you 'pro-science'; it just makes you confidently wrong. Second, I regret that colleagues to the right decided to turn this important resolution – which responds to the direct demands of European citizens of all genders – into an arena for voicing transphobic sentiments and anti-trans ideology. It is not worthy of this House, nor of the significance of this initiative. Decisions taken in the European Parliament should be based on facts, evidence and science, not fear-based myths and prejudice. Lawmakers should know the difference.