Political Group Memberships
Voting Statistics
Group Alignment
How often this MEP votes with their political group majority.
Rebel Subjects
Topics where this MEP most often breaks with their political group.
Procedures
7 votesA10-0040/2026 – Birgit Sippel – Commission proposal
A10-0040/2026 – Birgit Sippel – Proposal for rejection
European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure
Fund European digital infrastructure development focusing on semiconductors, cloud, AI, and connectivity, while reducing reliance on non-EU providers.
Resolution seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part
Request the Court of Justice to assess the EU-Mercosur agreement's compatibility with EU treaties regarding legal basis and precautionary principle.
Resolution seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part
Request the Court of Justice to assess the EU-Mercosur agreement's compatibility with EU treaties regarding legal basis and precautionary principle.
Written Explanations
Written explanations of vote submitted after plenary sessions.
Guidelines for the 2026 budget - Section III
Zastupnik Picula naglašava kako, s obzirom na trenutne geopolitičke i institucionalne okolnosti, financijski pritisak, klimatske promjene i društvene izazove, pouzdan, robustan, fleksibilan i na ljude usmjeren proračun EU-a ostaje ključan za provedbu politika Unije i za odgovor na rastuće potrebe ljudi. Također, zastupnik smatra kako je, u vrijeme kada se ljudi sve više okreću k EU-u za odgovore na pitanja, apsolutno ključno da EU ponudi rješenja s ograničenim resursima koji mu stoje na raspolaganju te se ti resursi moraju iskoristiti na efikasan način koji će rezultirati dugoročnim socijalnim i ekonomskim prednostima. Imajući sve prijašnje na umu, zastupnik Picula podržava ovaj izvještaj jer je isti uravnotežen i kompromisan.
Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024
Zastupnik Picula podržava izvješće i njegov sadržaj. Izvješće govori kako rat u Ukrajini destabilizira i ugrožava istočnu Europu, kao i zapadni Balkan, čime se erodira europska sigurnosna arhitektura. Nadalje, izvješće poziva EU i države članice da povećaju i ubrzaju sve oblike pomoći Ukrajini kako bi Ukrajina mogla ostvariti pobjedu. Izvješće poziva visoku predstavnicu Kaju Kallas da napravi sveobuhvatnu strategiju EU-a za Bliski istok i da se poveća prisutnost EU-a u regiji Bliskog istoka. Također, izvješćem se poziva EU da ojača suradnju i koordinaciju s partnerskim državama, što je krucijalno u današnjem kontekstu gdje određeni akteri pokušavaju destabilizirati međunarodni poredak i potkopati načelo multilateralizma.
No written explanations available.