Kim VAN SPARRENTAK
Procedures
231 votesResolution on Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland
Fund air defence systems for Ukraine and deploy detection and interception capabilities along the Union's eastern flank to counter Russian hybrid military incursions.
2025 Commission report on Georgia
Condition Georgia's EU integration on democratic reforms and demand targeted sanctions against officials responsible for state capture, repression, and sanctions circumvention.
Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peace
Fund transboundary water management and diplomacy in EU external action to prevent conflicts and guarantee access to drinking water in fragile regions.
2025 Commission report on Kosovo
Condition pre-accession aid to Kosovo on measurable reforms in the rule of law, anti-corruption, and the protection of non-majority communities.
2025 Commission report on Bosnia and Herzegovina
Condition EU accession funds for Bosnia and Herzegovina on implementing judicial, electoral, and anti-corruption reforms to protect the rule of law.
Written Explanations
Written explanations of vote submitted after plenary sessions.
Drones and new systems of warfare – the EU‘s need to adapt to be fit for today‘s security challenges
GL-PvdA supports this report, as it offers valuable perspectives on adapting the Member States’ armed forces, EU programmes and institutions to challenges in relation to the integration of drones, anti-drone measures and other innovative systems of warfare. The geopolitical situation and swift changes in global alliances merit supporting the overall report. However, GL-PvdA explicitly distances itself from the Frontex references in paragraphs 39, 323 and 324. We strongly oppose this report’s language advocating for an of Frontex mandate expansion, to include military capabilities and tasks, which dangerously blurs the line between defence and border management. Due to previous human right abuses by Frontex, affording quasi-military powers entails significant risks, and requires a radical shift in its modus operandi, oversight, and legal framework. While limited information exchange between Frontex and armed forces, in line with data protection and fundamental rights obligations, may be pertinent, the mandate for territorial defence must remain the exclusive responsibility of our armed forces, that have clearly defined democratic and legal frameworks. Moreover, the European Commission foresees a revision of the Frontex Regulation in 2026. Taking a Parliamentary position on such a sensitive matter is premature.
No written explanations available.